Sunday, May 25, 2014

Bring the ‘sexy’ back to farming!

PHOTO: civileats.com
Lots of folk are genuinely concerned about the aging population of famers in the USA. Who is going to grow our crops, raise our livestock and put food on the American table when this generation of farmers is too old to farm and quite literally dies out?  How serious is this threat to our food system and are we right to be worried about the future of food?
One outspoken ‘celebrity’ farmer in the USA who oozes optimism, joie de vive, and who is not afraid to tell you ‘how it is’ isn’t so worried; he sees the current ‘age crisis’ as a rallying cry for change. “The aging farm population is creating cavernous niches begging to be filled by creative visionaries who will go in dynamic new directions” Joel Salatin.

So instead of bemoaning the aging population of farmers in the USA we should be celebrating the fact that we are opening up a niche for the younger generation to fill – with their fresh ideologies for a sustainable planet, their embracement of new technologies that can actually bring sustainable farming into the 21st century.  ‘Natural’ farming methods don’t have to work against science, and importantly science doesn’t have to work against nature; we are teetering on a brand new age for farming.  A new age of agriculture where we can farm sustainably hand in glove with new technologies, without resorting to genetically modified organisms, without spraying our crops with a deluge of chemicals, where livestock can be raised as nature intended – without bars, without mutilations, without being forced to eat a diet which makes them sick, and where they are able to engage in their natural behaviours. This new age is ripe for moving to new levels, and we need an optimistic and energetic youth to take it forward.

Why does farming need a re-vamp?  And why should we be relying on the younger generation to do it?  In answer let’s take a brief look at the last eighty years of farming…
When and why did it all go wrong? In the mid part of the 20th century farming for the most part turned its back on nature, as a result of the culmination of different reasons and different forces at work  - although many anecdotally attribute the birth of factory farming to the Kentucky (or was it Kansas?) chicken farmer who accidentally ordered too many chicks from the hatchery and had to raise them indoors because she had nowhere else to put them; then finding it so successful did it again with the next flock …and the rest is history (thanks to Frank Perdue).  So that story aside here is my exploration of an event that shook the fabric of the whole world, and changed the global population in every facet of its culture and way of life, including farming, and potentially is an encompassment of the many reasons for the demise of 20th century agriculture – World War II.
Up until the first quarter of the 20th century farming was a way of life  - what your grandfather did and what your father did – farming, as an occupation, was what you inherited not what you necessarily chose.  A farmer born and bred didn’t question why he was doing it, or what he could be doing differently with his or her life – one farmed and one got on with it.  Then after WWII the attitude of folks globally had a radical change.  The world had shifted and regular Joes shifted with it.
Some of the lads that would have gone into farming were drafted to fight for their country and saw a different world-view.  They had to grow-up quickly without the security of home, they saw new technologies, different cultures, and discovered that a much bigger world existed outside of their farm acreage.
Agriculture during the war was in the hands of the women and the farmers too old to be drafted, and between them they did a magnificent job of producing food whilst the younger men were fighting on the front lines.  However, a bigger industry was growing during this period – science, technology and engineering – these industries were busily producing the munitions, machinery and the accouterments of war: the era of science and technology was in full throttle. By the time the lads, lucky enough to come back from the war fields, arrived home the fields of agriculture were no longer appealing, and the celebrity of the farmers holding the fort on the home front waned quickly after the war.
With this new modern view of the world, folks started to view farming as a lowly career, where one got ones hands dirty, Why toil in the dirt with smelly animals from sunrise to sunset 365 days a year, be at the mercy of mother nature whilst donning rubber boots and a pair of overalls, when factories with regular guaranteed pay, and jobs in cities with clean offices beckoned, where new technologies were being developed, where one could leave the vicariousness of nature behind and not have to worry about paying the bills after swine fever or a crop failure left one broke.


PHOTO: http://www.wamt.org
BUT then came the dawn of modern farming – if the rest of world could modernize why not farming too? Under this modern umbrella farmers could produce more in less time, machinery could do many of the jobs that before had to be done by hand, weeds could be annihilated by chemicals, hundreds and thousands of animals could be raised on a relatively small acreage and their growth sped up with synthetic hormones, animal fodder came in bags and not from foraging the land…the dawn of industrialization of farming hit the ground running. So why wouldn’t farmers embrace this, why wouldn’t farming seem attractive again?  This was the promise of a new land, the old farmstead inherited from grandpa and grandma could be brought up to speed, perhaps there was a career in farming after all. The baby boomers could be modern, efficient, produce prodigiously, and make money.  Suddenly agriculture was attractive again.  
The modernization of farming has brought with it many problems  - dubious animal welfare, environmental damage, and methods that many agree are injurious to human health.  This is the agriculture that the new generation has inherited and which many are rejecting and reevaluating. This is the dawn of a food revolution, the toll of industrialization is now plainly evident and more and more people are questioning how food gets to the table, more and more farmers’ markets are opening up across the USA, more and more people are wanting to close the chasm between the food producers and what they put in their bellies.  A demand for healthy and clean food is on the increase.  The time is right for young folks to eschew the industrialized practices of their parents and grandparents (the ‘baby boomers’) and move forward with a sustainable yet modern agricultural system.  The baby-boom generation of farmers is getting older and many are ready to pass on the mantle of farming to the young folk – a chasm that can be filled by “creative visionaries who will go in dynamic new directions”.   I was at a sustainable agricultural conference recently and my colleague (‘the Epicurean’) pointed out that the room was filled with folks that looked like they belonged on the pages of an Abercrombie and Fitch magazine rather than Farming Weekly! Now this is not the “sexy” I am talking about here but the point of this observation is that it is very exciting to see so many young folk (who embrace new technologies like ducks to water) engaging with sustainable agriculture, and we need to keep them engaged.  Many of the older farming generation are stuck in the old ways – and ironically the ‘old ways’ are the modern industrialized methods - so it’s time for young folk to jump into the farming seat and ‘post-modernize’ farming with sustainable and high animal welfare standards as the linchpins thereby guaranteeing a healthy future for our food, our health and the health of the planet.
PHOTO: http://www.agweb.com/

So let’s be hip, cool and many of the other trendy adjectives in the lexicon of ‘vogue’ because in order to engage the young people and make farming attractive this is truly the way forward – we need to bring the “sexy” back to farming!
~ THE ACTIVIST










1 comment: